Site icon Ottawa Life Magazine

A learning moment for Erin O’Toole and Rex Murphy on racism in Canada

Erin O’Toole’s refusal to outright apologize for his hurtful comments about residential schools sends a stealth signal to the extremists on the fringes of the Conservative Party that he has their back. This will drive away the middle of the road voters he needs if he wants to be PM. Worse, it shows a complete lack of character for a national leader and is deeply disappointing. His remarks about residential schools made over Zoom with the University of Toronto Campus Conservative Club earlier this month, where he described the woke campaign to rename Ryerson University because of the role the schools namesake played in creating the residential school system, were breathtakingly ignorant and highly insensitive for a national leader to make. They are especially offensive since we know so much of the history of the genocidal policy that was laid out in all its horror in the 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Report (TRC) which, ironically, was initiated by former Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative government, in 2008.

Among his many assertions about the policy, O’Toole claimed former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau opened more residential schools than Egerton Ryerson did and said no one is trying to take Trudeau’s name off Montreal’s airport. That claim alone is proof enough that O’Toole has never read the Truth and Reconciliation Report because if he had he would not made such a preposterous comment. O’Toole also told students that, “When Egerton Ryerson was called in by Hector Langevin and people, it was meant to try and provide education,” and that, “It became a horrible program that really harmed people, and we have to learn from that and I wear orange. But we’re not helping anyone by misrepresenting the past.” To be clear the only person misrepresenting the past is Erin O’Toole. O’Toole is also a lawyer and was fully aware of former Justice (now Senator) Murray Sinclair’s comments as head of the TRC panel when he said “that what took place in residential schools amounts to nothing short of cultural genocide — a systematic and concerted attempt to extinguish the spirit of Aboriginal peoples.” The report documented horrific physical abuse, rape, malnutrition, and other atrocities suffered by many of the 150,000 children who attended the schools, typically run by Christian churches on behalf of Ottawa from the 1840s to the 1990s.

O’Tooles comments to students are similar to sentiments published last June in the National Post by Columnist Rex Murphy who wrote an article titled,‘Canada is not a racist country despite what the Liberals say’.

Both O’Toole and Murphy could learn a thing or two from a low key Deputy Minister in Ottawa about what racism is and how it really exists in Canada and why the line of thinking they espouse only continues to ferment and justify racist attitudes in Canada. Daniel Quan-Watson is the Deputy Minister of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. A Deputy Minister is the highest position a public servant can hold in the Canadian federal government department. Usually civil servants, especially Deputy Minister's remain in the background and rarely, if ever, would publish an open letter or opinion.

After reading the National Post article, Deputy Minister Quan-Watson took the unusual step of responding to Murphy’s claim that Canada is not racist with an unvarnished and rather personal rebuttal in the form of an 'open letter. The letter is what is often referred to as 'a learning or teaching moment.’

When I read Murphy’s article it reminded me of a great line from Susanna Kaysen's book Girl, Interrupted — “Every window on Alcatraz has a view of San Francisco.” When I heard about O’Toole remarks I felt immediate disbelief and was stunned at how an educated man who could be a future PM could say such a thing. Then I felt an immediate concern for Indigenous people who must be feeling that nothing is changing.

The lesson for Mr. Murphy and Mr. O’Toole may be that they really do not understand the depth of racism that still exists in Canada and that our country is not what they perceive it to be. Ironically, it will be people like Deputy Minister Quan-Watson who may get us there yet. I highly recommend Erin O’Toole request a meeting with Quan-Watson. It should begin with an apology and then O’Toole might ask Quan-Watson what specific suggestions he has to bring the Tories into the 21st century about racism in Canada.

Recently, there has been an alleged case of racial discrimination in a casino in Burnaby (B.C.) against a black-presenting woman. As a result, a complaint was filed with the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal against Gateway Casinos and Entertainment, the casino’s parent company. Episodes like this are a contributing factor to the growing success of new online casinos and gambling venues – not to mention the fact that several studies have documented the associations between racism and addictive behaviours, including PG (problem gambling).

This is the Quan-Watson open letter.


UNCLASSIFIED / NON CLASSIFIÉ

By Daniel Quan-Watson

In a recent column, Rex Murphy asks some important questions about racism in Canada. Among others, he asks “How much are racism and discrimination actually ‘a part of the Canadian reality’? Are they overwhelmingly present? Are they . . . a central part of Canadian life?”. It would appear that these are posed as rhetorical questions to which the answer is “No”. He concludes that, “To any fair mind, Canada is a mature, welcoming, open-minded and generous country” and that “has been doing its best to be tolerant and welcoming”.

Mr. Murphy’s life experience appears to have brought him to the conclusion, after having had a remarkable opportunity to get to know and see Canada and Canadians from coast to coast to coast, that racism in this country is only an individual and exceptional phenomenon. I am genuinely happy that he has not felt himself the victim of racism in his life. No one should ever feel that.

I will take his questions at face value, though, because the very essence of understanding racism (or sexism, or other prejudices) is to understand whether or not those from other backgrounds live a different experience. The views I offer below are derived from my direct and personal experience over a period of more than 50 years. I do not speak on behalf of other individuals and certainly not on behalf of an entire country. The best that I can do is to tell some part of my story.

To begin with, I was born in Canada, have only ever lived here and will only live here. I have lived in five provinces and one territory. I have visited each and every jurisdiction in the country, from the northern tip of Ellesmere Island to Point Pelee and from the Yukon/Alaska border to Cape Spear. You would have a hard time telling whether French or English is my mother tongue. I have been a Deputy Minister with the Government of Canada for over a decade, meaning that I have been given one of the greatest opportunities that any Canadian could ask for in helping to shape the life and future of this country. I have been given the privilege of leading cherished national institutions, writing legislation that will shape this country for generations, and helping solve issues that affect all of us. Very, very few Canadians have had more support, more opportunity, more encouragement, and more acceptance by Canada and Canadians than I have. I have access to the highest offices in the country within government, industry, academia and the not-for-profit sector. I have more privilege than all but a very small number of Canadians, regardless of their race. Consequently, for much of my life, I have had more scope and more access to power to respond to problems than all but the smallest number of Canadians.

But that is not my whole story, and that is what I write about today.

I am of Chinese-Canadian ancestry on one side of my biological family and Polish and Irish on the other. It is generally immediately obvious to most people who meet me for the first time that I am of Asian ancestry. I was adopted and lovingly raised by the descendants of Scottish and English immigrants whose ancestors arrived in Canada well over a century ago.

When it comes to the prevalence of racism, it is worth noting that even the most meticulous record keeping victim (not that I’ve ever met one) will never truly know how many times it has affected them. Many tend to think of racism as the obvious outbursts and the spectacular. The burning of a cross or the shouting of a racially-based insult. Racism, though, is like an iceberg to a ship traveling at night. You may or may not see it as you travel, but if you do, the visible part is only the smallest percentage of the danger you face. Because of this, sometimes you don’t notice it at the time. You just realize later that a gash has been torn below the waterline that you need to deal with. The easy instances to spot are when you hit racism head-on and it’s spectacular and everyone around can see it. As a result, there will never be a perfect count of the instances of racism.

The list below is a small sampling of things that happened to me that I believe were based on race. To put an order of magnitude to it, I would estimate, now in my mid-fifties, that I would have faced something in the order of 10,000 slights, insults, decisions or actions directed at me based on race over the course of my life. I might be out by a couple of thousand in either direction, but not by much. On many days in my youth, when peers had not yet learned that being obvious could lead to trouble for them, 10, 20 or more incidents would not have been unusual. If you can’t get out of your own dressing room in minor hockey without facing multiple insults, by the time the other team gets involved, the numbers grow quickly. A group of bullying children can accomplish a lot when ganging up on another. High School, university, career and daily life saw the continuation of these patterns. Some of the incidents listed below are very, very recent.

If it sounds to you that this could not possibly be true or that it must at least be exaggerated in some way, I would suggest this: ask a person of colour who you know and trust to be honest with you if this list reminds them of their experience. If not, great, it means that I may be the only one. If it does resonate, it means that we probably have some work to do. It also says something very important, though, if there is no person of colour in your life with whom you would feel comfortable asking that question. Particularly if you’re sceptical or you’ve already concluded that I must be wrong.

I have not spent my life curating a list of injuries. Until I read this question, I had never even thought about trying to put a number to them. It’s not exactly something that I have a desire to remember, let alone discuss or share. They are in fact amongst the most painful moments of my life. But, if the question is about the prevalence and centrality of these experiences in Canadian lives, I offer them here. Maybe, in this way, those injuries will serve a better purpose than I would ever have imagined and an infinitely better purpose than their perpetrators would have wanted or intended.

With that as an introduction, here is a sampling of events that I have lived:

This is a small sampling of my life. How often do I encounter racism and how present is it? When will it happen next? Maybe when I buy gas today. Maybe when I meet a new neighbour. Maybe when I attend a meeting. Maybe when my child calls me at the end of the day to tell me how it went. Or maybe not today or tomorrow. One thing is certain, though, it will happen again at some surprising moment The same is true for my children.

So, to Rex Murphy’s question about how much is racism and discrimination a part of the Canadian reality, I will speak to my own Canadian reality and will say that it’s like high blood pressure. It’s always there. I don’t know when I’m going to notice it, or how or when it will show up. Even when it does, I can’t always see its consequences right away, but it is definitely present and it definitely isn’t good. My life does go on, and I am enjoying it immensely. No one who knows me has ever once described me as a complainer. I choose to not let it define me. But, just as with high blood pressure, I would be both wrong and foolish to pretend that it isn’t there, that it isn’t something with negative impacts, and that it will just go away.

Many, many people don’t have high blood pressure. They will never experience it. That’s fantastic. But just because they don’t have it, and because I have found ways of dealing with it and refuse to let it define me does not mean that is doesn’t exist or that it isn’t having an impact.

I have heard about each and every one of these things that it was all in my head. That maybe I was to blame. That I should have sat down and talked with the individuals in question to make them understand (first said to me when I was about 6). I have been plainly disbelieved and accused of fabricating the story for some benefit that would accrue to me (I never figured that one out, but I remain curious).

The real problem isn’t with the things that I know happened to me. It’s with what else these individuals are prepared to do in their spheres of influence, and with others who think and feel the same way but who wouldn’t go as far as to actually say or do such things openly. If you’re prepared to actually do and say things like what I’ve outlined above, what decisions and actions are you taking when no one can see what you’re doing? Who are you hiring? Who are you never hiring? How are you welcoming your new neighbours who look like me? How are you treating my child when you’re their coach or teacher? How welcome are people like me in your church or club? Through what lens will you see my potential when considering my school, job or promotion application? How seriously are you taking the life stories we are telling? What will your reaction be when we are being considered for positions and roles that will help shape our shared future?

The impact that you can have on a group of people without ever once saying anything openly hateful or violent is infinitely greater than the impact you can have in the spectacular moment of calling me or someone else a Chink in front of a crowd. We tend not to hand power to people who do that type of thing openly. But what happens when the person making life-changing decisions that affect me cannot fathom that anyone like me is a true Canadian, who is wondering or asking how I got to speak English so well or when I came to Canada, someone whose logic is that I am a less-deserving newcomer? What happens when the person making the decisions thinks that some, most or all of the stories of discrimination that people of colour “never seem to stop complaining about” are invented or exaggerated?

There are only five possible reactions to my story and others like it, if you discount the sometimes attractive option of simply ignoring it altogether. One of these must be true:

  1. I have invented it all or deliberately exaggerated it meaning that no response is warranted;
  2. It did happen to me, but it was just my bad luck because it didn’t happen to anyone else or it happened to so few people that only individual and exceptional responses are required;
  3. These things did happen, but I have misinterpreted innocent or benign actions incorrectly and should not have understood them to be malicious or detrimental. As a result, I am the one who needs remediation;
  4. These things did happen, but people like me need to understand that that is just the price you have to pay if you want to enjoy the benefits that this country has to offer; or
  5. My story is not only true but it is representative of those of many other Canadians. In this scenario, my story and those of everyone else who has had a similar experience deserve to be listened to, believed and acted upon in accordance with what we claim as Canadian values.

I take no quarrel whatsoever with the statement that Canada is a “mature, welcoming, open-minded and generous country”. In fact, I am staking everything on it being proven true.

My question, Rex Murphy, is can we be mature, welcoming, open-minded and generous enough to recognize that I haven’t invented what I have said, I haven’t invented the impact that I have felt, and that at least the essence of my experience may well be shared by even millions of Canadians?

I think that the answer is yes. In fact, I have great confidence that the answer is yes. If there is one country on the face of this planet that can do it, it is Canada. We have more than 153 years of experience confronting very difficult questions and coming out the better for having done so. We have the values and the abilities to address this one too and to do it better than anyone else from what I have seen around the world.

But if your question is “Aren’t we good enough already that we should drop this topic?” then my answer is a plain “No.”

A question was asked about my experience and that of other Canadians of colour. I have offered my response on the basis of it having been asked in good faith. If my situation is unique or nearly unique, then the conclusion offered by Mr. Murphy should stand. If my experience resonates with that of 100,000 other Canadians or 1,000,000 or more, there comes a point where that conclusion can no longer stand. If it can’t, we face another very difficult and defining question: “So what are we going to do now?”

Exit mobile version