Accidents can be stressful.
You may deal with injuries. There are also car repairs and police reports to worry about. And also all the legal hoops that you have to jump through in order to get a settlement.
But it turns out that after all that, your insurer can come for some of your settlement money. This common process is called “subrogation.”
It may feel unfair. But unfortunately, it is allowed.
Your health insurer simply identifies how much they paid toward your accident medical care. They then send you a subrogation notice demanding reimbursement of those expenses from your injury out-of-court legal settlement funds.
The insurer argues that since they covered those medical costs initially, they should be paid back now that you have received compensation. This essentially prevents you from unjustly profiting twice for the same medical bills.
Laws regarding health insurance subrogation and reimbursement requests vary widely between states. Certain states have statutes expressly protecting car accident victims from excessive demands:
• Some states reduce or limit what can be recouped related to legal fees incurred in obtaining the settlement. For example, Illinois law allows recovery only of medical expenses minus a proportionate share of lawyer’s fees and expenses.
• Certain states mandate that accident victims must retain a specified minimum percentage of their settlement amount regardless of what was paid out in medical benefits. For example, New Jersey regulations allow patients to keep at least 20% of their total gross recovery.
• A few states outright prohibit subrogation demands for certain types of insurance plans altogether. For example, Indiana bars reimbursement claims related to individually purchased health insurance policies.
Do not assume you must automatically repay every dollar demanded by the health insurer. There is often room to negotiate and legally challenge excessive or unreasonable demands. Potential strategies include:
• Carefully Review Settlement Breakdown: Make sure you understand exactly what damages make up the settlement amount and the justification behind attorney fees/costs. Any unreasonable padding could be leveraged to reduce subrogation.
• Dispute Medical Bill Errors: Identify and challenge any duplicate charges, inflated prices, services never rendered, arithmetic mistakes, etc. This evidence can limit reimbursement demands substantially.
• Prove Limited Net Recovery: Show detailed proof of all accident-related losses incurred beyond just the reimbursed medical bills to demonstrate the remainder of the settlement is reasonable personal compensation.
• Highlight Comparative Fault: If you were assigned any percentage of fault for causing the accident during insurance negotiations or court proceedings, the insurer’s reimbursement should be reduced by that same proportion.
• Request Equitable Distribution: Propose partial or structured repayments that consider both parties’ interests fairly based on all case circumstances. Offering 20% upfront and 5% annually for several years may be reasonable.
An experienced personal injury or subrogation attorney can provide invaluable help.
In such cases, they can help with managing health insurer reimbursement demands by doing the following:
• Thoroughly analyze the insurance policy terms and identify any limitations or reductions that apply. Even simple language differences can impact outcomes significantly.
• Handle all direct communications and negotiations with the health insurer’s legal and financial teams on your behalf.
• Compile supporting documentation on case damages, liability arguments, state subrogation protections, settlement itemization, etc. to challenge excessive demands.
• Outline step-by-step legal arguments on why full reimbursement would be inequitable and propose reasonable alternative repayment solutions.
Obtaining professional legal assistance from the very start of injury claim proceedings can set the stage for minimizing future subrogation disputes altogether or placing you in a stronger position when they do arise. This is why hiring a lawyer is often cited as the most important thing when it comes to what to do after a car accident.
While all health insurance providers maintain subrogation rights to varying degrees, different plan types handle reimbursement demands quite distinctly:
Most employer-based plans and individually purchased policies permit standard subrogation processes. Group plans are very aggressive about maximizing reimbursement. However linguistic loopholes in individual plan documents can provide better leverage for negotiating repayment reductions.
Medicare, Medicaid and military/veterans plans have expanded statutory subrogation powers that are more rigid. But they also have administrative rules, internal guidelines and appeals procedures that a skilled attorney can sometimes utilize to benefit the insured’s interests.
Since workplace injury laws prevent employees from suing employers, workers’ compensation medical benefits cannot be reimbursed directly from employer-liability settlements. But if a third party like an equipment manufacturer or site contractor contributed to the work incident, they or their insurer are liable – allowing the workers’ comp insurer to initiate subrogation recoveries from any civil case or settlement funds.
Keep in mind that health insurers are only permitted to seek reimbursement up to the amount you received from a third-party settlement that covers the same medical bills they paid initially. Logically, the higher your total settlement amount, the more they can demand back.
Common elements that directly impact subrogation rights:
The full amount paid out by the health insurer for accident-related medical treatment establishes the maximum they are permitted to recover. If they paid $50,000 in expenses, that sets the ceiling.
The larger the amount received from the liability insurer to settle injury claims, the more leverage the health insurer has to recoup its costs. Settling quickly for inadequate compensation can backfire.
Insurers aim to recoup their expenses as a proportion tied directly to the percentage of the settlement flowing from the damages category related to medical costs vs. other losses like property damage, lost earnings, etc.
If 30% of the settlement amount is attributed to attorney fees, the subrogation demand can be reduced proportionately. If they paid $50,000 in medical bills but 1/3 of the settlement went to legal fees for obtaining it, they may only be able to seek $35,000.
No health insurer simply has an automatic entitlement to full reimbursement without reasonable proof. There are many ways to limit repayment demands through legal arguments and negotiated compromises. Common strategies include:
Dispute unreasonable medical charges line-by-line – inflated prices prevailing in their geographical area, markups over the Medicare fee schedule, services never actually rendered, arithmetic errors, cost of unnecessary treatment not causally related to the accident injuries, etc. Even minor billing adjustments can significantly reduce subrogation amounts.
Thoroughly audit every single medical charge covered by the insurer to identify duplicate bills, charges entered under the wrong patient name, services provided after care should have been terminated, confusion about what items were paid by health insurance vs. auto insurance vs. worker’s compensation, etc. Finding substantial billing mistakes severely weakens reimbursement arguments.
Providing evidence of ongoing medical needs, lost income, retirement plan impacts, surviving family burdens, etc. shows a human perspective. This can persuade insurers to accept smaller repayments over longer periods to avoid pushing the victim toward bankruptcy or public assistance. Structured settlements distribute risk and still make them mostly whole eventually.
Outlining precisely how all the various accident loss categories consume most or all of the settlement funds places capped limits on subrogation rights. If the settlement was wholly proportionate and appropriate to the full scope of damages, reimbursement becomes inequitable.
As this overview illustrates, health insurance subrogation after auto accident injury settlements involves a tangled web of complex legal and financial concepts.
Policies differ, state statutes vary, and negotiations get complicated in a hurry. Without guidance from an attorney well-versed in injury law and subrogation protocols in your jurisdiction, protecting your rights can prove extremely difficult.
Be sure to consult a qualified legal professional as early in the process as possible – ideally before even settling your accident claim with the liability insurer. Capable counsel can provide invaluable help in formulating wise strategies, compiling persuasive evidence, communicating with insurers firmly but tactfully, and arguing reasonable legal positions to limit subrogation demands. They know every trick in the book to maximize the funds remaining in your pocket at the end.
While handing any portion of your settlement over to your health insurer may feel deeply unjust, with smart legal navigation you can likely reduce the payment below what they expected. Perhaps even more importantly, professional legal advice helps prevent leaving additional money unclaimed on the table or agreeing to reimbursements prematurely when recourse options remain.
In closing, understand the basics of how health insurance subrogation works after auto accident settlements but do not hesitate to call an attorney to protect your rights fiercely during intensely high-stakes negotiations.
Photo: iStock
